![]() Swing gets bashed because a) it didn’t take off, and b) people always saw Swing apps as ugly and great examples of the uncanny valley. There is some validity to some of this, but I also wanted to discuss the other side too. You can’t create a great experience without going native (and Apple raised the bar on the experience!).Cross platform never works (case in point: Swing).When we talk about the mobile Web being a good candidate to be a unifying platform for mobile and beyond, we often get nay-sayers telling us that there is no chance of this happening. on Star Trek, as seen at the top of this entry. You can’t just make something meh and cheap and win.Īlso, the nail in the coffin, we have seen the tablet in the future…. Apple loves their margins and all, but they have a lot of room to make life reaaal hard for any competitor. I had a huge gulp when I HP bought Palm and I quickly saw that we couldn’t make a tablet for the same price as the iPad. One big one is that the CLONES can’t just come in and win here. That assumes that the same natural forces are in play, and I think there are huge differences. Time to dig in and execute.īut, there lies the other problem that Farhad Manjoo articulated. Add to that the fact that iOS will grow and grow, and I think that the fad isn’t here chaps. They would never go back to an OS of yore. they were free to explore and get things done. Instead of being afraid of messing up their computer, or worrying about viruses and the like…. I got them both iPads in short order as I saw a consumer-oriented OS for the first time. Then I turn from myself, and I think about my Mum and mother-in-law. Mixing and matching iOS and OS X though? Mmmm. OS X isn’t ever going to be touch friendly like iOS. ![]() That doesn’t work though, as the UI would then end up in old Windows stylus land. maybe this is a fad! The iPad killer could be the Macbook Air! In fact, the killer could be an Air with a retina display and the ability to touch the screen and undock it! I enjoy it for certain tasks, mainly content consumption, but it is niche. and I could have multiple windows on the same screen (which was nicer than putting my iPad in a keyboard dock say). It turned out that having a keyboard was a nice feature! As was this “hinge” thing that meant that I didn’t have to hold the device…. At this point the iPad stayed in my bag so much more. Comparing my iPad to my 17″ Macbook Pro was different to the new work of the light, small, SSD packing, powerful Macbook Air. Shortly thereafter however, I got a MacBook Air, which is by far the best computer I have ever owned. I felt like a dork pulling it out for meetings, so I kept it tucked away, but it had its place. At first it was fun to explore the touch interface, and I carried it everywhere I went. I remember getting the first iPad… such a long couple of years ago. I know that the iPad was purchased more than any laptop from another manufacturer… but I can also sniff the fad. I mean, who buys Hula Hoops, Furbies, and lava lamps no mo?įarhad Manjoo lays out his case on how the iPad could be unbeatable, and how competitors may be just hoping that the tablet is a fad.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |